Skip to main content

GRAPEVINE, Texas, March 16, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — United Development Funding (“UDF,” as described below) announced today the Supreme Court of Texas (the “Supreme Court”) denied Kyle Bass (“Bass”) and Hayman Capital’s (“Hayman,” as described below, and together with Bass, “Bass/Hayman”) petition to review the matter of J. Kyle Bass, et. al. versus United Development Funding, L.P., et. al.

On June 12, 2018, the Dallas County Court (the “Court”), after allowing limited discovery, ruled that UDF had set forth a prima facie case of intentional business disparagement and tortious interference by Bass/Hayman, denying Bass/Hayman’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit under the Texas Citizen’s Participation Act (TCPA).  On June 29, 2018 Bass/Hayman filed a notice of accelerated appeal with the Texas Judicial Branch Fifth Court of Appeals (the “Appeals Court”). UDF filed its Appellate brief on November 15, 2018 opposing Bass/Hayman’s appeal and presented its oral argument to the Appeals Court on May 2, 2019.  On August 19, 2019 the Appeals Court affirmed the earlier decision by the Court to deny Bass/Hayman’s bid to dismiss the lawsuit under the TCPA.  The Appeals Court reviewed over 2,000 pages of pleadings, affidavits and evidence, concluding “UDF’s pleadings and affidavits explain how and why Hayman’s statements were false” and “Illustrate and describe how and why Hayman made the false statements knowingly or recklessly, and chronicle the economic and business damages and losses UDF sustained as a direct result of Hayman’s false statements.”

On November 6, 2019 Bass/Hayman filed a Petition for Review with the Supreme Court.  On January 22, 2020 UDF filed its Response to Bass/Hayman’s petition and on February 20, 2020 Bass/Hayman filed their reply. UDF expects the Supreme Court to remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings in 30-40 days. Upon remand, full discovery and trial will follow. No assurances can be given that UDF will receive any damages as a result of the lawsuit, nor can any assurances be given regarding a timeframe for a resolution of the lawsuit.

The UDF plaintiffs are represented by Ellen A. Cirangle, Jonathan E. Sommer and Kyle A. Withers with Lubin Olson & Niewiadomski LLP, who have extensive experience successfully litigating market manipulation claims against hedge funds; Judge Scott A. Brister of Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, who has previously provided 20 years of judicial service at all levels of the Texas Court system including the Texas Supreme Court; and Rodney Smolla, Dean of the Delaware Law School of Widener University and a nationally-recognized expert in First Amendment law.

Public documents filed with the Supreme Court can be found at the Supreme Court of Texas website (, using the Case No. 19-0874. Public documents filed with the court, including discovery and UDF’s filings, can be found at A complete history of all the court filings related to this case can be found at the Court’s website (, using the Case No. CC-17-06253-C. 

“UDF” refers to plaintiffs United Development Funding, L.P., United Development Funding II, L.P., United Development Funding III, L.P., United Development Funding IV, United Development Funding Income Fund V, United Mortgage Trust, United Development Funding Land Opportunity Fund, L.P., and United Development Funding Land Opportunity Fund Investors, L.L.C.

“Hayman” refers to defendants Hayman Capital Management, L.P., Hayman Offshore Management, Inc., Hayman Capital Master Fund, L.P., Hayman Capital Partners, L.P., Hayman Capital Offshore Partners, LP and Hayman Investments, LLC.

About United Development Funding IV

United Development Funding IV is a public Maryland real estate investment trust. UDF IV was formed primarily to generate current interest income by investing in secured loans and producing profits from investments in residential real estate. Additional information about UDF IV can be found on its website at UDF IV may disseminate important information regarding its operations, including financial information, through social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements may relate to business prospects, outcome of litigation and other matters. We make these forward-looking statements in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements included in this press release that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will exist or may occur in the future, are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current intents, beliefs, expectations and assumptions and on information currently available to management that are subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control, and could cause future events or results to be materially different from those stated or implied in these forward-looking statements. Words such as “may,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Investors should read the cautionary statements set forth in our periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.